Re: pg_upgrade's exec_prog() coding improvement
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade's exec_prog() coding improvement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5040CF90.3070704@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade's exec_prog() coding improvement (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade's exec_prog() coding improvement
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/24/2012 11:44 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Again, win32 testing would be welcome. Sadly, buildfarm does not run > pg_upgrade's "make check". Yesterday I added a new module to the buildfarm client code to run this (<https://github.com/PGBuildFarm/client-code/commit/ab812cb9920c65e39ec7358dc816371f1fef31eb>). It required a couple of tweaks in the base code. This will be in a new buildfarm client release fairly shortly. It's running on crake now, and I will add it to pitta to get some Windows coverage. It would be a lot nicer is the test were written in Perl, since we don't necessarily have a Bourne shell available for MSVC builds, but we definitely have Perl available. None of this does what I think we really need, which is cross-release pg_upgrade testing, which remains on my TODO list as a fairly high priority item. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: