Re: setObject(...) with native Java arrays like String[] ?
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: setObject(...) with native Java arrays like String[] ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5036E589.8060501@ringerc.id.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: setObject(...) with native Java arrays like String[] ? (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On 08/23/2012 11:00 PM, Dave Cramer wrote: > To be candid, I need help managing the patches. > > Many times the patches come in without test cases or without > documentation. All of these things require me to spend time I don't > have. [snip] > Notionally someone other than the submitter would review the patch. > > Thoughts ? I've done enough Java and JDBC work now that I can do a half-decent job with PgJDBC patch review. I'm happy to help. It'd make sense to be able to manage patch review so it's easy to keep track of. I see two options for that: - Use the commitfest app, which fits the main server workflow but requires wrangling message-IDs and manual updates of the tracking that're sure to be forgotten; or - Use GitHub pull requests, which are much nicer to work with and more familiar to more people, but inconsistent with the main server's workflow. I don't see any sign that PgJDBC development has used the commitfest app recently, and there's no "PgJDBC" topic, only "Clients". Do you have a preference? Given the chance I'd *love* to work via GitHub. -- Craig Ringer
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: