Re: setObject(...) with native Java arrays like String[] ?
| От | John Lister |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: setObject(...) with native Java arrays like String[] ? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 503671BC.7080204@kickstone.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: setObject(...) with native Java arrays like String[] ? (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: setObject(...) with native Java arrays like String[] ?
|
| Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On 23/08/2012 16:00, Dave Cramer wrote: > To be candid, I need help managing the patches. > > Many times the patches come in without test cases or without > documentation. All of these things require me to spend time I don't > have. > > Also many patches or requests are very specific "itches" which solve a > particular problem for the submitter. Every new feature adds > complexity and possibly negatively effects performance. It is useful > to keep in mind that the driver is used by lots of other people who > will not benefit from this particular feature request. > > > So I am open to suggestions as to how to manage this better. I know > that the main postgresql project has a system where other people > review patches. This seems like it is a good idea. > > Notionally someone other than the submitter would review the patch. > Sounds like a good idea, I'm happy to review patches if required. Is there a set of guidelines that need to be followed in determining if a patch should be accepted? John
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: