Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core?
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 502BBE9D.6060106@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core?
Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/15/2012 06:48 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 6:11 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >>> Is there a TODO here? > > If anybody's concerned about the security of our password storage, > they'd be much better off working on improving the length and randomness > of the salt string than replacing the md5 hash per se. Or change to an md5 HMAC rather than straight md5 with salt. Last I checked (which admittedly was a while ago) there were still no known cryptographic weaknesses associated with an HMAC based on md5. Joe -- Joe Conway credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: