Re: Cirrus-ci is lowering free CI cycles - what to do with cfbot, etc?
| От | Daniel Gustafsson |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Cirrus-ci is lowering free CI cycles - what to do with cfbot, etc? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 50231BF3-A48C-484B-AADB-F6E80FB1DA9A@yesql.se обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Cirrus-ci is lowering free CI cycles - what to do with cfbot, etc? (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On 13 Sep 2023, at 01:49, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2023-08-30 10:57:10 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >>> On 28 Aug 2023, at 14:32, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote: >> >>> Attached is a patch with a quick PoC for using PQPing instead of using psql for >>> connection checks in pg_regress. >> >> The attached v2 fixes a silly mistake which led to a compiler warning. > > Still seems like a good idea to me. To see what impact it has, I measured the > time running the pg_regress tests that take less than 6s on my machine - I > excluded the slower ones (like the main regression tests) because they'd hide > any overall difference. > My patch increased user/sys time a bit (likely due to a higher number of > futile psql forks), but Daniel's doesn't. And it does show a nice overall wall > clock time saving. While it does add a lib dependency I think it's worth doing, so I propose we go ahead with this for master. -- Daniel Gustafsson
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: