Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kevin Grittner
Тема Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123
Дата
Msg-id 502230D102000025000494AC@gw.wicourts.gov
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Did we ever decide on this?
We discussed it to the point of consensus, and Tom wrote a patch to
implement that.  Testing in my shop hit problems for which the cause
was not obvious.  I don't know whether there is a flaw in the
designed approach that we all missed, a simple programming bug of
some sort in the patch, or pilot error on this end.  It's on my list
of things to do, but it's hovering around 4th place on that list,
and new things seem to be appearing at the top of that list at about
the rate that I can clear them.  :-(
> Is it a TODO?
We don't want to lose track of it, but with a pending patch to
debug, I'm not sure the TODO list is the right place to put it.
-Kevin


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bug in libpq implentation and omission in documentation?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bug in libpq implentation and omission in documentation?