Re: [HACKERS] Patching dblink.c to avoid warning about open transaction

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> The problem with not using rconn is that we are not saving the
> transaction status at the _start_ of the cursor open.  If we don't do
> that, we have no way of knowing on close if _we_ opened the transaction
> or whether it was opened by the user.

Oh, I see.  In that case the flag is horribly misnamed and miscommented.
Something like "newXactForCursor" would be clearer.

            regards, tom lane