Re: gcc 13 warnings
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: gcc 13 warnings |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 501f7d61-5423-fb23-9010-d37bcac1f845@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: gcc 13 warnings (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: gcc 13 warnings
Re: gcc 13 warnings |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 16.03.23 19:11, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2023-03-16 13:54:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: >>> On 2023-03-16 12:10:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>>> It wouldn't be entirely surprising if meson is selecting some -W >>>> switches that the configure script doesn't ... but I don't know >>>> where to check or change that. >> >>> I think it's just that meson defaults to -O3 (fwiw, I see substantial gains of >>> that over -O2). I see such warnings with autoconf as well if I make it use >>> -O3. >> >> Oh, interesting. Should we try to standardize the two build systems >> on the same -O level, and if so which one? > > I'm on the fence on this one (and posed it as a question before). O3 does > result in higher performance for me, but it also does take longer to build, > and increases the numbers of warnings. > > So I just elected to leave it at the default for meson. AFAICT, the default for meson is buildtype=debug, which is -O0. The -O3 comes from meson.build setting buildtype=release. I think a good compromise would be buildtype=debugoptimized, which is -O2 with debug symbols, which also sort of matches the default in the autoconf world. (https://mesonbuild.com/Builtin-options.html#details-for-buildtype) At least during the transition phase I would prefer having the same default optimization level in both build systems, mainly because of how this affects warnings.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: