Re: Interrupted pg_dump / pg_restore Upgrade
От | Thomas F. O'Connell |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Interrupted pg_dump / pg_restore Upgrade |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 501B3D58-9283-4EBA-AAB0-545511159EDC@o.ptimized.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Interrupted pg_dump / pg_restore Upgrade (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Jan 4, 2007, at 7:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > "Thomas F. O'Connell" <tf@o.ptimized.com> writes: >> My big question is: Is there anything that happens late in the game >> in a pg_dumpall that affects system catalogs or other non-data >> internals in any critical ways that would make an interrupted >> pg_dumpall | psql sequence unstable? > > There's quite a lot of stuff that happens after the data load, yes. > One thought that comes to mind is that permissions aren't > granted/revoked until somewhere near the end. But why don't you > look at the output of "pg_dumpall -s" and find out for yourself > what got lost? Yeah, now that I think about it, though, everything that pg_dumpall produces is SQL or DDL, so unless it does anything involving preservation of system catalogs that is critical, I'm somewhat less concerned about this particular issue. I still intend to review the schema diff, but I think there are some other issues that need investigation as well. Thanks for the tip. -- Thomas F. O'Connell optimizing modern web applications : for search engines, for usability, and for performance : http://o.ptimized.com/ 615-260-0005
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: