Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user
От | Avi Schwartz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5017D3D8-9C87-11D7-A1AF-000393AE5044@CFFtechnologies.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user ("Maksim Likharev" <mlikharev@aurigin.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
The biggest improvement we noticed was in two areas. We have some very complex selects that join 7-8 tables which perform 30-40% faster under PGSQL. The second thing that performs better are the above mentioned result set returning stored procedures. BTW, the reason we started looking at PSQL is not due to performance, this just came as a pleasant surprise. The real reason is in the fact the we are 90% linux in our server environment and the only Windows component is SQL Server 7. SS7 does not play nicely with Linux and lacks any tools to use from the Linux environment. Windows itself is hard to manage remotely and since the production environment is co-located it became a real issue. Avi On Wednesday, Jun 11, 2003, at 22:24 America/Chicago, Maksim Likharev wrote: > My I ask on what operations PG better than MSSQL? > > cause out of my observations only spatial data types, > could influence a choice between MSSQL and PG. > > Thank you.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: