Re: Update on 'portal' changes
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Update on 'portal' changes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 50156.80.177.99.193.1078952162.squirrel@ssl.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Update on 'portal' changes (Alexey Borzov <borz_off@cs.msu.su>) |
Ответы |
Re: Update on 'portal' changes
|
Список | pgsql-www |
It's rumoured that Alexey Borzov once said: > Hi! > > I must apologize for once again starting the flame. English is not my > native language and I have a tendency of making the statements harsher > than I really want them to be. > > I am of course not thinking that you "do nothing and know nothing", as > we have a working site right now. OK, apology accepted. As this has happened more than once though, might I politely suggest that you count to ten and re-read your messages before sending them - just in case? > But I do want to point out that there is too little communication going > on: between the "insiders", between the "insiders" and (potential) > "contributors" as well. There is no easily available plan, list of > things to be done, list of thing being done, whatever. I agree things are not perfect and could be improved. Some random thoughts: - Some while ago (iirc following your suggestion) I enabled the tasks list on the pgweb GBorg project. Let's *all* start using that - I have added a couple of tasks to get started; please add any more - the smaller the better so ppl can easily pick one that will take just a few minutes if they like. - I outlined a three phase plan as you know. If you have additional detail for the work you are doing (phase 1) please share it (as numbered tasks on the project if you like). - Part of the problem stemmed from lack of communication between Josh and the rest of us (which he has already explained). This was a simple oversight, the only part of which I was not aware of being the pgfoundry name. The project, and surrounding discussions I have followed as anyone could in -hackers. - There will *always* be a certain central group of us in this team (yes, insiders if you like). The reasons for this are twofold - 1) we speak "officially" for the project as the site webmasters, and 2) we have root on the various servers. People get into this group generally because they have proven their commitment to the project over *many* years. There is no great secrecy about anything we do though - just the odd administrative decision, and dealing with enquiries from members of the public. You ain't missin much believe me! I hope this clears a few things up and allows us to move forward :-) Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: