Re: ZFS vs. UFS
От | Laszlo Nagy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ZFS vs. UFS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 500EEB05.6030005@shopzeus.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ZFS vs. UFS (Torsten Zuehlsdorff <foo@meisterderspiele.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: ZFS vs. UFS
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
> On 24.07.2012 14:51, Laszlo Nagy wrote: > >> * UFS is not journaled. > > There is journal support for UFS as far as i know. Please have a look > at the gjournal manpage. Yes, but gjournal works for disk devices. I would have rely on the hw card for RAID. When the card goes wrong I won't be able to access my data. I could also buy an identical RAID card. In fact I could buy a complete backup server. But right now I don't have the money for that. So I would like to use a solution that allows me to recover from a failure even if the RAID card goes wrong. It might also be possible to combine gmirror + gjournal, but that is not good enough. Performance and stability of a simple gmirror with two disks is much worse then a raidz array with 10 disks (and hot spare), or even a raid 1+0 (and hot spare) that is supported by the hw RAID card. So I would like to stick with UFS+hw card support (and then I need to buy an identical RAID card if I can), or ZFS.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: