Re: ZFS vs. UFS
| От | Georgi Naplatanov |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: ZFS vs. UFS |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 500E9D31.6050107@oles.biz обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | ZFS vs. UFS (Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Hi. As far as I know UFS is faster than ZFS on FreeBSD 9.0. Some users reported stability problem with ZFS on AMD64 and maybe UFS is better choice. Best regards Georgi On 07/24/2012 03:51 PM, Laszlo Nagy wrote: > > Hello, > > Under FreeBSD 9, what filesystem should I use for PostgreSQL? (Dell > PowerEdge 2900, 24G mem, 10x2T SATA2 disk, Intel RAID controller.) > > * ZFS is journaled, and it is more independent of the hardware. So > if the computer goes wrong, I can move the zfs array to a > different server. > * UFS is not journaled. Also I have to rely on the RAID card to > build the RAID array. If there is a hw problem with it, then I > won't be able to recover the data easily. > > I wonder if UFS has better performance or not. Or can you suggest > another fs? Just of the PGDATA directory. > > Thanks, > > Laszlo >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: