Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium
От | Lincoln Yeoh |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5.2.1.1.1.20040213204143.025c05a8@mbox.jaring.my обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Hmm, do you mean 64 bit postgresql on Solaris-Sparc isn't significantly better performance-wise than 32 bit postgresql on Solaris-Sparc? Interesting. How about very large databases? At 07:17 AM 2/13/2004 -0500, Andrew Sullivan wrote: >On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 12:46:58PM -0500, Christopher Browne wrote: > > Lots of people have been running it on 64 bit systems for _years_ now. > > The Digital Alpha architecture, for instance, was introduced in the > > 1992, and Sun UltraSPARC in 1995. PostgreSQL has been running well on > > these sorts of systems for a lot of years now. > >But actually, there are problems with using postgres as a 64 bit >application on Solaris. It works, and it's reliable, but I've never >seen any evidence that it helps anything (and I've looked plenty). > >A > >-- >Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca >In the future this spectacle of the middle classes shocking the avant- >garde will probably become the textbook definition of Postmodernism. > --Brad Holland > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your > joining column's datatypes do not match
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: