Re: Benchmark
| От | Patrick Meylemans |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Benchmark |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5.2.1.1.0.20050213202121.029592b8@server04.site04.wtcm.be обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Benchmark (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Dear,
We are using PostgreSQL for 4 Years now, one can say it is a blessing to maintain. Our previous database was number one (;-), it was much harder to maintain so labor is a pro for PostgreSQL ...
Kind Regards
Patrick Meylemans
IT Manager
WTCM-CRIF
Celestijnenlaan 300C
3001 Helerlee
At 11:34 13/02/2005 -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
We are using PostgreSQL for 4 Years now, one can say it is a blessing to maintain. Our previous database was number one (;-), it was much harder to maintain so labor is a pro for PostgreSQL ...
Kind Regards
Patrick Meylemans
IT Manager
WTCM-CRIF
Celestijnenlaan 300C
3001 Helerlee
At 11:34 13/02/2005 -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org> writes:
> After all, the cost of a computer system to run the transactions is
> likely to be comprised of some combination of software licenses and
> hardware costs. Even if the software is free, the hardware isn't.
And labour costs.
--
greg
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: