Re: - what protocol for an Internet postgres
От | Fernando Flores Prior |
---|---|
Тема | Re: - what protocol for an Internet postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5.2.1.1.0.20030514114936.01e29e28@148.244.92.34 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: - what protocol for an Internet postgres connection (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: - what protocol for an Internet postgres
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Ok, Now I have a better vision of what can be accomplished with the options that you gave me. Thanks a lot (Richard, Doug and Tom). -Fernando At 12:37 p.m. 14/05/2003 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >Doug McNaught <doug@mcnaught.org> writes: > > Fernando Flores Prior <fprior@tlaloc.imta.mx> writes: > >> So, it is safe then to use ODBC for an Internet connection ? > >> I'm in doubt about that, mainly because of the lag involved > >> on this kind of network and its transient failures that may > >> cause a disconnection. > > > It's as safe as any other API--as I said, there's only one wire > > protocol used by all libraries. Lag will just slow things down but > > should not cause any data loss. If your connection drops too often > > due to packet loss there isn't much you can do about that at the PG > > level--get a better network connection. :) > >However, from a security standpoint I don't think there's any question >that you want to use SSL encryption for any database connection that >passes over the open Internet. I seem to recall that the ODBC driver >(still) doesn't support SSL --- if so, that would be reason enough not >to use it. Or to invest the effort to fix it. > > regards, tom lane > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: