Suggestions?
От | Naomi Walker |
---|---|
Тема | Suggestions? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5.1.0.14.2.20030425142033.029aeb68@imap.eldocomp.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: After restoring a database using pg_restore , cannot insert or update records in tables with primary keys (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
We have a legacy application that currently uses an old isam style database (from db/c). Piece by piece, we are rewriting our application to use Postgres. In addition to being a software company, we also offer ASP service, and run the application for many customers on a cluster of Solaris boxes. I've been pondering the benefits of having: a database per customer (in one cluster) one big-a** database (one cluster) a few clusters, a few combined databases We perform pg_dumps every evening, one per database. If we need to replace some rows for a particular table, we would have to put back the entire database somewhere, extract the rows we need, and transfer those to production. Besides for backing up every table separately for every database, is there a saner way to handle this? It is EXTREMELY important that our ASP customers do not have access to each others data. Some of the access to the data is by JDBC connection. Some is by ODBC connection. Other than views, is their some way to secure the data (that is not a maintenance nightmare)? Thanks, Naomi
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: