Re: PostgreSQL in mission-critical system
| От | Doug Fields |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostgreSQL in mission-critical system |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5.1.0.14.2.20020713142616.01f248a8@pop.pexicom.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL in mission-critical system (Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL in mission-critical system
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
At 06:17 AM 7/13/2002, Curt Sampson wrote: >You should probably go with whatever database you (or your DBA) >know best. If you don't know any, PostgreSQL is as good as any. Actually, I'd say, if you don't know any, PostgreSQL is much better than most. I've installed (or tried to install) these databases on Linux: MySQL PostgreSQL DB2 Oracle 8i I completely failed to get DB2 or Oracle up and running - the system requirements, disk partitions, etc., required are nearly incomprehensible and they don't give you any human-comprehensible documentation. MySQL has a very complicated user/table/permissions system, but very few tuning parameters, so it is very easy to set up. (All its other drawbacks relative to PostgreSQL have already been discussed.) PostgreSQL is relatively easy to set up (the hardest part is setting it up for multiple users and remote access - but that takes only a little while of reading the pg_hba.conf and the createuser command), but probably harder to tune well. So, as Curt says, if you've never run any database on Linux - do yourself a favor and use PostgreSQL if you have any but the most simple requirements (for which MySQL would probably suffice). Also - PostgreSQL on Debian/Woody is super-simple to use: $ apt-get install postgresql postgresql-dev postgresql-clients postgresql-doc $ createdb mytest $ psql mytest and you're off and running. Cheers, Doug
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: