Re: converting Oracle to postgres
От | Lincoln Yeoh |
---|---|
Тема | Re: converting Oracle to postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5.1.0.14.1.20030207232129.02d7a0b0@mbox.jaring.my обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: converting Oracle to postgres (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: converting Oracle to postgres
|
Список | pgsql-general |
At 09:58 AM 2/7/03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >will trillich <will@serensoft.com> writes: > > i think plpgsql is standard these days, so you should be able to > > create procedures without having to "install" or "activate" it. > >No, you still do need to do 'createlang' to set it up. There's been >debate about whether to make it standard. A paranoid DBA might not >*want* PLs available. Yes. Don't want a repeat of MS SQL Server. I'm sure there are people who need to format c:\, dir, etc using MS SQL. But most people don't need this stuff installed by default. It might not be so bad at the start if you install a language by default. But if the language/features get extended you could end up with a lose-lose situation. Regards, Link.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: