Re: SASL, compression?
От | Lincoln Yeoh |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SASL, compression? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5.1.0.14.1.20020520134750.02ff54a0@192.228.128.13 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SASL, compression? (Bear Giles <bgiles@coyotesong.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: SASL, compression?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
What are the benefits of SASL+Postgresql compared to Postgresql over plain SSL? Coz Postgresql already supports SSL right? Cheerio, Link. At 03:11 PM 5/18/02 -0600, Bear Giles wrote: >If it's being used in Sendmail, Cyrus IMAP and OpenLDAP, with preliminary >work (sponsored by Carnegie Mellon University) in supporting it for CVS >and LPRng and possibly SSH I think it's safe to say it's beyond "vaporware" >at this point. >I'm aware of the various tricks you can do - setting the shell to >/bin/false, requiring RSA authentication and setting the no-tty flag >in the 'known_keys' file, etc., but at the end of the day there are >still extra shell accounts on that system. > >SSH tunnels are a good stopgap measure while you add true TLS/SSL >support, but they can't be considered a replacement for that support. > >Bear
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: