Re: Why are triggers semi-deferred?

At 10:38 AM 12/07/2003 -0700, Stephan Szabo wrote:
>  deferred after trigger row 1
>  deferred after trigger #2 row a
>  deferred after trigger row 2
>  deferred after trigger #2 row b

I'd vote for this; ie. make them execute in the same order they would 
execute if they were not deferred. Otherwise you open up all sorts of weird 
application errors if a trigger is deferred/not-deferred.


----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498)          |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 03 5330 3172          |                 ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|                                 |    --________--
PGP key available upon request,  |  /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/