Why are triggers semi-deferred?
От | Philip Warner |
---|---|
Тема | Why are triggers semi-deferred? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5.1.0.14.0.20030505151940.047fc048@mail.rhyme.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Why are triggers semi-deferred?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At least in 7.3, triggered actions specified as AFTER seem to be deferred to the completion of the outer-most SQL statement. So, if two triggering statements are executed as part of a PLPGSQL procedure, they will not be executed until the outermost statement finishes. As far as I can tell, this is not the way the spec says it should work: The <triggered SQL statement> of a triggered action is effectively executed either immediately before or immediately after the trigger event, as determined by the specified trigger action time. In the case of statements executed sequentially inside a PLPGSQL procedure, I would have expected that the trigger would fire after the first triggering statement. Have I missed a discussion of this (I have looked), or is this just a known problem? ---------------------------------------------------------------- Philip Warner | __---_____ Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \ (A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_ Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \ Fax: (+61) 03 5330 3172 | ___________ | Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \| | --________-- PGP key available upon request, | / and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: