Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
От | Philip Warner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5.1.0.14.0.20021023021621.0427f008@mail.rhyme.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 12:00 PM 22/10/2002 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: >It does have the advantage of being more portable on systems >that do have integral off_t I suspect it is no more portable than determining storage order by using 'int i = 256', then writing in storage order, and has the disadvantage that it may break as discussed. AFAICT, using storage order will not break under any circumstances within one OS/architecture (unlike using shift), and will not break any more often than using shift in cases where off_t is integral. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Philip Warner | __---_____ Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \ (A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_ Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \ Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ | Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \| | --________-- PGP key available upon request, | / and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: