Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
От | Philip Warner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5.1.0.14.0.20021002094856.03b36ff8@mail.rhyme.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 11:20 AM 1/10/2002 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: >BSD/OS has 64-bit off_t's so it does support large files. Is there >something I can test? Not really since it saves only the first 32 bits of the 64 bit positions it will do no worse than a version that supports 32 bits only. It might even do slightly better. When this is sorted out, we need to verify that: - large dump files are restorable - dump files with 32 bit off_t restore properly on systems with 64 biy off_t - dump files with 64 bit off_t restore properly on systems with 32 bit off_tAS LONG AS the offsets are less than 32 bits. - old dump files restore properly. - new dump files have a new version number so that old pg_restore will not try to restore them. We probably need to add Read/WriteOffset to pg_backup_archiver.c to read the appropriate sized value from a dump file, in the same way that Read/WriteInt works now. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Philip Warner | __---_____ Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \ (A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_ Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \ Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ | Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \| | --________-- PGP key available upon request, | / and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: