Re: DB crash on "drop table" interruption
От | Stanislas Pinte |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DB crash on "drop table" interruption |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5.0.2.1.0.20010201100649.00a9ca40@195.74.212.23 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: DB crash on "drop table" interruption (Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
At 08:28 AM 2/1/01 +0900, you wrote: >Stanislas Pinte wrote: > > > > hello, > > > > I just had a DB crash when interrupting manually a drop table operation, > > and when interrupting manually (using kill) a vacuumdb operation. Is it > > normal, or is it a bug? > > > >What does the DB crash mean ? The DB crash doesn not mean a backend crash. It means the lost of 80% of the tables of the database. here is the scenario: 1: I initiated a "drop table mytable" operation. 2: It started to took 15 minutes, then I decided that laybe users were using this table 3: I killed the postgresql process. 4: I opened pgsql 5: I listed the tables ..."mytable" still there 6: I issue a drop table again, after having restarted the backend (not properly...a "kill" then a "postmaster start ") 7: the drop table doesn't work, even if the table "mytable" still appears. 8: I issue a "vacuumdb"...take hours, and stays blocked on my problematic table 9: I re-killed the back-end. 10: I started the DB: only four tables left...mytable and a lot of others have disappeared. >Regards, >Hiroshi Inoue ------------------------------------------------------- Stanislas Pinte Software engineer - Trademine-europe Tel: 00 32 486 67 78 86 Fax: 00 32 2 706 59 34 -------------------------------------------------------
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: