Re: adding partitioned tables to publications
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: adding partitioned tables to publications |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4f999141-97c8-c968-a726-0a1ec3e36e47@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: adding partitioned tables to publications (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: adding partitioned tables to publications
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-03-30 17:42, Amit Langote wrote: > I have updated the comments in apply_handle_tuple_routing() (see 0002) > to better explain what's going on with UPDATE handling. I also > rearranged the tests a bit for clarity. > > Attached updated patches. Test coverage for 0002 is still a bit lacking. Please do a coverage build yourself and get at least one test case to exercise every branch in apply_handle_tuple_routing(). Right now, I don't see any coverage for updates without attribute remapping and updates that don't move to a new partition. Also, the coverage report reveals that in logicalrep_partmap_init(), the patch is mistakenly initializing LogicalRepRelMapContext instead of LogicalRepPartMapContext. (Hmm, how does it even work like that?) I think apart from some of these details, this patch is okay, but I don't have deep experience in the partitioning code, I can just see that it looks like other code elsewhere. Perhaps someone with more knowledge can give this a look as well. About patch 0003, I was talking to some people offline about the name of the option. There was some confusion about using the term "schema". How about naming it "publish_via_partition_root", which also matches the name of the analogous option in pg_dump. Code coverage here could also be improved. A lot of the new code in pgoutput.c is not tested. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: