Re: [HACKERS] logical replication apply to run with sync commit offby default

On 4/13/17 17:52, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On 12/04/17 06:10, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 3/24/17 10:49, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>>> Rebase after table copy patch got committed.
>>
>> You could please sent another rebase of this, perhaps with some more
>> documentation, as discussed downthread.
>>
>> Also, I wonder why we don't offer the other values of
>> synchronous_commit.  In any case, we should keep the values consistent.
>> So on should be on and local should be local, but not mixing it.
>>
> 
> Now that I am back from vacation I took look at this again. The reason
> why I did only boolean initially is that he other values just didn't
> seem all that useful. But you are right it's better to be consistent and
> there is no real reason why not to allow all of the possible values.
> 
> So how about the attached?

committed

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services