Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4f832e27-20a4-964a-fafd-edf39e0ae883@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication
Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/25/22 04:10, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 5:44 AM Tomas Vondra > <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> >> Attached is a patch, rebased on top of the sequence decoding stuff I >> pushed earlier today, also including the comments rewording, and >> renaming the "transform" function. >> >> I'll go over it again and get it pushed soon, unless someone objects. >> > > You haven't addressed the comments given by me earlier this week. See > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1LY_JGL7LvdT64ujEiEAVaADuhdej1QNnwxvO_-KPzeEg%40mail.gmail.com. > Thanks for noticing that! Thunderbird did not include that message into the patch thread for some reason, so I did not notice that! > * > + * XXX The name is a bit misleading, because we don't really transform > + * anything here - we merely check the column list is compatible with the > + * definition of the publication (with publish_via_partition_root=false) > + * we only allow column lists on the leaf relations. So maybe rename it? > + */ > +static void > +CheckPubRelationColumnList(List *tables, const char *queryString, > + bool pubviaroot) > > After changing this function name, the comment above is not required. > Thanks, comment updated. I went over the patch again, polished the commit message a bit, and pushed. May the buildfarm be merciful! -- Tomas Vondra EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: