Re: partitioned indexes and tablespaces
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: partitioned indexes and tablespaces |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4f7bea04-24ef-0779-bccd-72cc9fe42916@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: partitioned indexes and tablespaces (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: partitioned indexes and tablespaces
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/7/18 7:41 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:22 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> But maybe you've adopted that policy already. You back-patched a >>> behavior change 2 days before a minor release when the vote was 2-3 >>> against the change. >> >> It was? This is my count: >> For: Alvaro, Andrew, Tom >> Against: Michael, Robert, Andres > > Tom's message was posted after you had already committed it. His > vote counts from the point of view of determining retrospectively > whether your action had support, but you can't use it to justify the > decision to push the commit when you did, unless you used a time > machine to foresee his message before he posted it. > Yeah. I think the change is OK from technical POV - it essentially fixes behavior that is useless/surprising and would just result in raised eyebrows and bogus bug reports. No problems here. But the consensus probably was not there when it got pushed ... >> Also, I contested every point that was raised about this patch. I >> don't think there were any remaining technical objections. > > Sure, but I don't think the standard is whether you told people that > they were wrong. I think the standard is whether you convinced them > to revise their position. You sure haven't convinced me. > Yeah. While I think the objections were wrong, and Alvaro explained that pretty well in his response, there should have been more time for the OPs to respond before pushing the change. That's not great. FWIW, it was mentioned that "your only concurring vote came from someone with whom you share an employer" which kind suggests opinions/votes from people working for the same company are somehow less honest/valuable. I find that annoying and even insulting, because it kinda hints the company (or companies) are pushing people to respond differently than they would otherwise. Which I find rather insulting. regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: