Re: Proposal: Make use of C99 designated initialisers fornulls/values arrays
От | Chapman Flack |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal: Make use of C99 designated initialisers fornulls/values arrays |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4f4852b9-0ed5-b84c-03ae-ebc7725219ea@anastigmatix.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal: Make use of C99 designated initialisers fornulls/values arrays (Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal@pivotal.io>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal: Make use of C99 designated initialisers fornulls/values arrays
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/4/19 1:44 PM, Ashwin Agrawal wrote: > macro exist in first place will be hard to remember. So, irrespective > in long run, {0} might get used in code and hence seems better > to just use {0} from start itself instead of macro/wrapper on top. > > Plus, even if someone starts out with thought {1} sets them all to ones, > I feel will soon realize by exercising the code isn't the reality. I wish ISO C had gone the same place gcc (and C++ ?) went, and allowed the initializer {}, which would eliminate any chance of it misleading a casual reader. If that were the case, I would be +1 on just using the {} syntax. But given that the standard is stuck on requiring a first element, I am +1 on using the macro, just to avoid giving any wrong impressions, even fleeting ones. Regards, -Chap
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: