Re: GCC vs clang
От | Greg Sabino Mullane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GCC vs clang |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4e4f5cc5f660987390b4cdc3fc78c99a@biglumber.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: GCC vs clang (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: GCC vs clang
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Tom asked: > What happens to plperl? It still doesn't work. I was going to leave it out via --without-perl, and save fixing that for another day. There's a handful of other warnings when making, but --with-perl is the only showstopper (once the GNU_SOURCE problem is solved). Peter chimed in: > The underlying issue in clang has been resolved, so the next release > should work out of the box. I suggest we wait for that. > > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5365 Sweet, good to know. I'll update my clang repo and see if it does the trick. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201011161302 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAkzix3IACgkQvJuQZxSWSsgKxQCgl2vbUGS9plb1Zm7Sg+sdKR+5 oIUAn0CI9Dky2bQsYkoPhV6yZrQWosvQ =f0+q -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: