Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4d91a145-3915-4e0d-accb-29960edfdef7@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-10-03 Fr 10:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes:If you look at this more closely, creating postgres-full.xml and running the syntax check perform the same operations, except that the latter throws away the output. So it seems redundant to build a whole new code path for this. I think you can make the check target dependent on postgres-full.xml and be done, kind of like this (starting from pre-b2922562726):Would it be unreasonable to discard the "check" target altogether? It made sense back in the day when actually building the html docs took many minutes. But I haven't used it in years, so I wonder if anyone else has either.
I have no objection. We'll need to work out what we're doing on the meson side, which is kinda where we came in ...
cheers
andrew
-- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: