Re: allow online change primary_conninfo
От | Maxim Orlov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: allow online change primary_conninfo |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4cd4107ed423c8757636ec04342457bf@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: allow online change primary_conninfo (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: allow online change primary_conninfo
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-03-28 02:39, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2020-Mar-27, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >> On 2020-Mar-27, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> >> > I pushed the wal_receiver_create_temp_slot bugfix, because I realized >> > after looking for long enough at WalReceiverMain() that the code was >> > beyond saving. I'll be pushing the rest of this later today. >> >> So here's the next one. I still have to go over the doc changes here, >> but at least the tests are passing for me. > > Pushed with some documentation tweaks. > > Many thanks for working on this! Nice work! What do you think of possibility to add restore_command? Is it a good idea to make a restore_command to be reloadable via SUGHUP too? On the one hand it looks reasonable since primary_conninfo got such ability. On the other hand we don't exactly know whether the actual process after reload config would use "new" command or "old" since it may take a long time to finish running old command (in case of scp or smth). Also setting faulty restore_command lead to server termination, which is rather unexpectedly. If anyone makes some minor typo in restore_command, say write restore_command='cp1 /mnt/srv/%f %p' instead of restore_command='cp /mnt/srv/%f %p' and do SELECT pg_reload_conf() then server will terminate. Do you consider this feature useful? Any suggestions? --- Best regards, Maxim Orlov.
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: