Re: [HACKERS] SQL/JSON in PostgreSQL
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] SQL/JSON in PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4cbe3187-921b-d3a3-467c-d09bdd10b8c1@berkus.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] SQL/JSON in PostgreSQL ("Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@mail.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] SQL/JSON in PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/09/2017 10:12 AM, Sven R. Kunze wrote: > On 08.03.2017 20:52, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Peter van Hardenberg <pvh@pvh.ca >> <mailto:pvh@pvh.ca>> wrote: >> >> Small point of order: YAML is not strictly a super-set of JSON. >> >> Editorializing slightly, I have not seen much interest in the >> world for YAML support though I'd be interested in evidence to the >> contrary. >> >> >> The world of configuration management seems to for some reason run off >> YAML, but that's the only places I've seen it recently (ansible, >> puppet etc). > > SaltStack uses YAML for their tools, too. I personally can empathize > with them (as a user of configuration management) about this as writing > JSON would be nightmare with all the quoting, commas, curly braces etc. > But that's my own preference maybe. > > (Btw. does "run off" mean like or avoid? At least my dictionaries tend > to the latter.) Yes, but automated tools can easily convert between JSON and newline-delimited YAML and back. -- Josh Berkus Containers & Databases Oh My!
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: