24.07.2024 23:58, Thomas Munro wrote:
> +1. I'm not planning to back-patch that work. Perhaps lorikeet
> could stop testing releases < 16? They don't work and it's not our
> bug[1]. We decided not to drop Cygwin support[2], but I don't think
> we're learning anything from investigating that noise in the
> known-broken branches.
Yeah, it looks like lorikeet votes +[1] for your proposal.
(I suppose it failed due to the same signal processing issue, just another
way.)
[1] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=lorikeet&dt=2024-07-24%2008%3A54%3A07
Best regards,
Alexander