Re: procpid?
От | Greg Sabino Mullane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: procpid? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4a8c958d46b422c858499d61c8800fb0@biglumber.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: procpid? (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: procpid?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 > At any rate, I like "sessions". That's what it is, after all. But I > will note that we had better be darn sure to make all the changes we > want to make in one go, because I dowanna have to create pg_sessions2 > (or pg_tessions?) in a year or three. Or perhaps pg_connections. Yes, +1 to making things fully backwards compatible by keeping pg_stat_activity around but making a better designed and better named table (view/SRF/whatever). Sounds like perhaps a wiki page to start documenting some of our monitoring shortcomings? Might as well fix as much as we can in one swoop. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/ PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201106151246 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAk344ioACgkQvJuQZxSWSshy9wCgnrj4lQkaomsgS55yq9KI0HBl P2UAoI62Tkt9/U62l0Bxv/KfQUUlL/NF =aaTL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: