Re: Hot standby from Debian to Windows
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hot standby from Debian to Windows |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4a1d12b7-8bd0-b74f-87a7-a97ae4c177c8@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hot standby from Debian to Windows ("Andrus" <kobruleht2@hot.ee>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hot standby from Debian to Windows
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 3/29/20 11:35 PM, Andrus wrote: > Hi! > >> Would it not be easier to just set up another Debian server, run >> binary replication > > Breaks occurs rarely, 0-2 times per year. > I want try it first. Got it. Just thought it would be easier not to have to deal with cross OS issues. > >> and put them behind something like pgpool? > > Backup server will use single core and minimal RAM. It may be needed 0-2 > times per year. > > pgpool should switch to use it for production work only if main server > does not respond. > I havent found this feature in pgpool documentation (maybe missed). Here is one example: https://www.pgpool.net/docs/latest/en/html/example-watchdog.html > > Andrus. -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: