Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix integer-overflow problems in intervalcomparison.
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix integer-overflow problems in intervalcomparison. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4a192a84-9004-2263-6447-0fef95e18fa6@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix integer-overflow problems in interval comparison.
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
On 4/5/17 23:51, Tom Lane wrote: > Fix integer-overflow problems in interval comparison. > Branch > ------ > REL9_4_STABLE > > Details > ------- > http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/8851bcf8813baa0ea393ef9d2894d15b3f13f957 > > Modified Files > -------------- > src/backend/utils/adt/timestamp.c | 65 ++++++++-- > src/include/common/int128.h | 231 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > src/test/regress/expected/interval.out | 64 +++++++++ > src/test/regress/sql/interval.sql | 27 ++++ > 4 files changed, 376 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) This is failing cpluspluscheck now because C++ does not have _Static_assert, which is used in int128.h. I suppose this header is not intended for public consumption, at least in the back branches, so it would be OK to exclude it from the check. Perhaps a different solution would be appropriate in master. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: