Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?

On 2019/04/11 12:34, David Rowley wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 00:51, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Just so I don't forget about this, I've added it to the July 'fest.
>>
>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/23/2065/
> 
> Now that we have 428b260f8, I think the version of this that goes into
> master should be more like the attached.

Thanks, looks good.

I've posted a patch last week on the "speed up partition planning" thread
[1] which modifies ddl.sgml to remove the text about UPDATE/DELETE using
constraint exclusion under the covers.  Do you think there's any merit to
combining that with this one?

Thanks,
Amit

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4f049572-9440-3c99-afa1-f7ca7f38fe80%40lab.ntt.co.jp