Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation
От | Shaun Thomas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4FFDE659.7040104@optionshouse.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation (Craig James <cjames@emolecules.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 07/11/2012 03:18 PM, Craig James wrote: > It strikes me as a contrived case rather than a use case. What sort of > app repeatedly fills and truncates a small table thousands of times ... > other than a test app to see whether you can do it or not? Test systems. Any company with even a medium-size QA environment will have continuous integration systems that run unit tests on a trash database hundreds or thousands of times through the day. Aside from dropping/creating the database via template, which would be *really* slow, truncate is the easiest/fastest way to reset between tests. If TRUNCATE suddenly started defaulting to DELETE on small table-sets and several iterations led to exponential index growth, that would be rather unfortunate. -- Shaun Thomas OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 500 | Chicago IL, 60604 312-444-8534 sthomas@optionshouse.com ______________________________________________ See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: