Re: Change in datetime type casting
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Change in datetime type casting |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4FEC661A.8090102@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Change in datetime type casting (Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Change in datetime type casting
|
Список | psycopg |
On 06/28/2012 02:21 AM, Daniele Varrazzo wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Federico Di Gregorio <fog@dndg.it> wrote: >> On 28/06/12 01:19, Adrian Klaver wrote: > >>> Note the addition of the casts. This is causing problems when using the >>> hstore adapter as hstore expects a plain string. Is there a way to get >>> around this? >> >> The cast were introduced because PostgreSQL 9.x is much strictier about >> function signatures than the 8.x series. Sometimes functions taking >> parameters were not found because of the implicit text->other type cast. > > Hstore is a mapping from strings to strings, not a generic dictionary > mapping. There's never been a promise to adapt generic python > dictionary (mapping hashable -> anything) into it. Even if you ram a > python date into a postgres hstore, reading it back you will get a > string. Which begs the question why does the adapter not do str(value) when creating the ARRAY? > > You can write a custom adapter to map the datetimes to strings without > the cast and use them into hstore. Bigger question:) Is it possible to turn adaption off for a connection/cursor? > > -- Daniele > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@gmail.com
В списке psycopg по дате отправления: