Re: Some restructuring of the download section
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Some restructuring of the download section |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4FDDAA9F0200002500048597@gw.wicourts.gov обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Some restructuring of the download section (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Some restructuring of the download section
Re: Some restructuring of the download section |
Список | pgsql-www |
[resending because I accidentally failed to copy the list] Dave Page wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: >> >>> The large bold warnings about the installers [...] should either >>> be removed or made non-bold now. >> >> I wouldn't want to remove them at all, since they're clearly still >> correct. > I still maintain that it should be pretty blindingly obvious that a > graphical installer isn't an RPM or DEB I think that there are an awful lot of people capable of running PostgreSQL who don't understand Linux packaging systems. FWIW, at least half the tech support staff where I work would fail to assume that a downloaded graphical installer would not integrate the software in the same way that, say, the graphical "Package Manager" on Ubuntu or the graphical form of yast (on SUSE) does. I think the warning is appropriate. > and that being the case it seems like clutter on the page that is > distracting from the more important text that's there and will > achieve little except cause fewer people to actually read > everything else. I will agree that it should probably not be bold. When I pulled one of these pages up, it tended to be the first thing I read because it was the only bold item on the page -- my eye was drawn there right away. In terms of confusing entries, though, describing the non-yum option as a "one click installer" makes it sound like it is the fast and easy way to do this. My experiences with the yum packages is that there are no clicks needed. I type the apt-get command or pick the package in the GUI package manager and a few secons later I have a running PostgreSQL instance without any further interaction, and which will automatically be updated with new minor releases. I think we should provide some guidance on the reasons one would want to pick one or the other. One other minor point, I don't think we should use initials like PPA without defining them somewhere. How is someone not versed in Linux installer jargon supposed to know what a PPA is and whether they should consider using one? -Kevin
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: