Re: XLog changes for 9.3
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: XLog changes for 9.3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4FD09B5E020000250004818B@gw.wicourts.gov обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: XLog changes for 9.3 (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: XLog changes for 9.3
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> wrote: > Anything changing filenames will break every HA config anybody has > anywhere. It will impact our scripts related to backup and archiving, but I think we're talking about two or three staff days to cover it in our shop. We should definitely make sure that this change is conspicuously noted. The scariest part is that there will now be files that matter with names that previously didn't exist, so lack of action will cause failure to capture a usable backup. I don't know that it merits a bump to 10.0, though. We test every backup for usability, as I believe any shop should; failure to cover this should cause pretty obvious errors pretty quickly if you are testing your backups. -Kevin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: