Re: Libpq question
От | John Townsend |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Libpq question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4FB94B86.4000907@advancedformulas.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Libpq question (zeljko <zeljko@holobit.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Libpq question
Re: Libpq question |
Список | pgsql-general |
By by-passing the "dll" (or "so" on Linux) library I mean you write function or procedure calls to the server that is running as a service on Windows. You don't use the library with its 160 exported functions. You connect directly to the server thus saving one layer of protocols. To do this, you have to translate all the c functions you need (not just the headers or ".h" files) into pascal. Not a trivial task! Would it be worth it? Depends, but for most situations would not give you more speed. With FPC comes a nice utility called h2pas.exe that does a decent job and can save you a lot of time. You still have to clean some translations. Look at the *.c & *.h \src\interfaces\libpq directory that comes with the postgres source. John On 5/20/2012 7:51 AM, zeljko wrote: > John Townsend wrote: > >> It appears that some developers (Davart) are by-passing the standard >> client library, “libpq.dll”, and directly accessing the server using >> Delphi or FPC. I am not sure of the advantage here. All libpq.dll > I'm FPC user and I use libpq.so(.dll,.dylib) via zeoslib. > Those who bypass libpq probably uses odbc connections or similar. > > zeljko > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: