Re: reset implementation
От | Federico Di Gregorio |
---|---|
Тема | Re: reset implementation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4FB64C11.8080705@dndg.it обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: reset implementation (Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com>) |
Список | psycopg |
On 18/05/12 11:53, Daniele Varrazzo wrote: >> > IMHO that's correct for connection.reset() but I don't know how many >> > people out there are using NOTIFY and .reset() togheter and I don't want >> > to break their code. > My assumption is that if somebody calls reset() he doesn't expect the > connection to keep on doing what it was before. But I've already > created more than one issue thinking something wouldn't have had side > effects, while in real world... so I don't want to push too much on > this. If nobody comment on this issue at all we can suppose the number of affected people would be extremely low (and I know no big framework out there uses connection.reset()). So it is a +1 unless someone objects. federico -- Federico Di Gregorio federico.digregorio@dndg.it Studio Associato Di Nunzio e Di Gregorio http://dndg.it Abandon the search for Truth; settle for a good fantasy. -- Anonymous
В списке psycopg по дате отправления: