Re: Postgres 9.0 Streaming Replication and Load Balancing?
От | Paulo Correia |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres 9.0 Streaming Replication and Load Balancing? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4FB3C907.8070700@pdmfc.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres 9.0 Streaming Replication and Load Balancing? (Sumit Raja <sumit.raja@raja-consulting.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres 9.0 Streaming Replication and Load Balancing?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Hello Sumit, At the given point there are no exceptions since the tests for using pgPool-II with the application using a master and a slave resulted in all connections being done on the master and none on the slave. As the application as it's own connection pool, eventually all connections will have a RW operation and as so all these connections will be linked to the master. As so, I cannot benefit from load balancing since all my connections will be redirected to the master by pgPool-II, even if they are RO. Is it possible to have pgPool-II making only load balance with no connection pool? Best regards, Paulo Correia On 15/05/12 09:01, Sumit Raja wrote: > On 14 May 2012 17:28, Paulo Correia<paulo.correia@pdmfc.com> wrote: >> Hello all! >> Having a Postgres 9.0 with assynchronous streaming replication to a >> hot-standby slave, both with CentOs 5.6, how can I use both DB instances for >> query load balancing? >> I've tried with pgPool-II but the pooling mechanism is disruptive with the >> existing pool on the application servers. > Is the application RW or read only? What is the disruption being > caused? Are you seeing specific exceptions? > > - Sumit >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: