Re: UDF in C slow
От | Inanc Seylan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: UDF in C slow |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4FAD37AA.9080603@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: UDF in C slow (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
I'm quite new to Postgres so I don't know how to read the execution plans. However it is obvious that the plans for the query with and without the function are different. I added some indices to the table roleassertions and it seems to solve this big difference in the execution times of both queries. So I guess it was not the function that was the problem in the end. Thanks a lot! Inanc On 5/11/12 5:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Inanc Seylan<inanc.seylan@gmail.com> writes: >> It is IMMUTABLE. I attach the output of EXPLAIN both with and without >> the simple function (returning true only) in the query. > > EXPLAIN ANALYZE would have been far more helpful. However, the thing > that jumps out at me here is all the seqscans on table "symbols". > Do you not have an index on symbols.id? If you do, perhaps there is > a datatype-mismatch problem preventing it from being used. > > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: