Re: Re: PATCH: The linker complains about the '-bundle_loader "../../src/backend/postgres"' against PostgreSQL 8.4 on OSX
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: PATCH: The linker complains about the '-bundle_loader "../../src/backend/postgres"' against PostgreSQL 8.4 on OSX |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4FA7A81B.7050400@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: PATCH: The linker complains about the '-bundle_loader "../../src/backend/postgres"' against PostgreSQL 8.4 on OSX (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: PATCH: The linker complains about the
'-bundle_loader "../../src/backend/postgres"' against PostgreSQL 8.4 on OSX
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On 07.05.2012 13:39, Dave Page wrote: > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Heikki Linnakangas > <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> for that matter. I'll fix this in git master. I consider the current tip of >> the old CVS repository (or the corresponding checkout from the git repo) to >> be the latest stable release, PostgreSQL one-click installers<= 9.1 can >> continue to use that version. > > Can you create a "PRE-9_2" branch for the current architecture, and > apply Ashesh's patch to that if you think it's a reasonable fix > please? We can then move the older builds to that branch. Then the 9.2 > changes can go on master. By current architecture, do you mean what we had in the CVS, or as the code stands in the current tip of the git repository? I agree we should create a branch like that, but I want to make sure we agree on where it should be branched off. I've rearranged and cleaned up the code quite extensively in git master already, and I'm not sure if we want to include all that in back-branches. On one hand, I've fixed a lot of bugs with the changes, so it would be nice to include those fixes, but OTOH, perhaps we shouldn't risk destabilizing back-branches. Then again, we can probably be more aggressive with pushing changes to pldebugger to back-branches, as it's not something you should be running in production anyway. It's just a development tool. Correct me if I'm wrong, Ashesh, but your patch is only needed to fix build issues I caused by rearranging the code and the Makefile in git master. The code at the point where we migrated from CVS to git builds fine on back-branches. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: