Re: Future In-Core Replication
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Future In-Core Replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4FA2B8AC.2030502@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Future In-Core Replication (Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/2/12 10:58 PM, Jim Nasby wrote: > On 4/29/12 6:03 AM, Simon Riggs wrote: >>> The DML-WITH-LIMIT-1 is required to do single logical updates on tables >>> > with non-unique rows. >>> > And as for any logical updates we will have huge performance problem >>> > when doing UPDATE or DELETE on large table with no indexes, but >>> > fortunately this problem is on slave, not master;) >> While that is possible, I would favour the do-nothing approach. By >> making the default replication mode = none, we then require a PK to be >> assigned before allowing replication mode = on for a table. Trying to >> replicate tables without PKs is a problem that can wait basically. >> > > Something that a in-core method might be able to do that an external one > can't would be to support a method of uniquely identifying rows in > tables with no PK's. A gross example (that undoubtedly wouldn't work in > the real world) would be using TID's. A real-world implementation might > be based on a hidden serial column. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: