Re: Should we drop the "object" from ORDBMS?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: Should we drop the "object" from ORDBMS?
Дата
Msg-id 4F9F14F4.1030107@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Should we drop the "object" from ORDBMS?  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Ответы Re: Should we drop the "object" from ORDBMS?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Список pgsql-advocacy
> I can see that "object-oriented" has been redefined so much that it can
> mean anything.

Indeed.  Just take a survey of programming languages.

> So, I suppose it doesn't hurt to leave it in the
> description.

Well, it's easier to say than "Not-Just-A-Relational Database Management
System" ;-)

Or maybe Relational++ database?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Davis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Should we drop the "object" from ORDBMS?
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Should we drop the "object" from ORDBMS?